• Twitter
  • LinkdIn

Nearly five million vehicle records shared with private parking firms in 2016/17

Nearly five million vehicle records shared with private parking firms in 2016/17

Private parking companies obtained 4.7 million sets of vehicle keeper records from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) in the last financial year, more than ever before.  

Official data revealed by the RAC Foundation shows the figure for 2016/17 was just over a million higher than in the previous financial year (2015/16: 3.67 million records) and represented an annual increase of 28%. In 2014/15 the figure was 3.08 million and the number has increased each year with just 272,000 vehicle keeper records obtained by parking management companies in 2006/7.  

The vast bulk of the information is likely to have been used by private parking companies to send Penalty Charge Notices - often up to £100 - to drivers who have allegedly infringed parking rules.  

The data suggests that a private parking ticket is now being issued every seven seconds; the equivalent of nine per minute, 538 per hour and 12,904 per day.  

Official data shows 109 parking companies bought data from the DVLA in 2016/17. The top five purchasers were: ParkingEye Ltd, 1,530,259 records; Smart Parking Ltd, 329,157; Euro Car Parks, 306,857; Ranger Services Ltd for Highview Parking Ltd, 271,917; and Athena ANPR Ltd, 246,743.  

The issuing and management of Penalty Charge Notices related to parking on private land has been an ACFO campaign topic for many years.  

Clamping on private land was banned - in all but exceptional circumstances - in 2012 by the Protection of Freedoms Act. The Act also allowed for private parking companies to pursue the registered keepers of vehicles they claimed to have infringed the rules rather than having to prove who the driver was at the time of the ’offence’.  

All private parking firms wanting to access the vehicle keeper data held by the DVLA - for which they charge £2.50 per record - need to be members of an Accredited Trade Association (ATA) and abide by the ATA’s code of practice. There are currently two ATAs: the British Parking Association and the Independent Parking Committee.  

Both ATAs have established independent appeals services to which drivers can take their cases questioning the validity of tickets if initial appeals to member firms themselves fail.  

Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, said: “These numbers are eyewatering. We all hoped the problems associated with parking on private land would go away when clamping was outlawed. It turns out we hoped in vain. Since the ban there has been a surge in ticketing. Something is clearly going awry.

“Of course the rights of private landowners need to be protected, but where landowners invite people to park on their property, often to benefit from their trade, the rules need to be fair to both parties. Time and again we hear stories of people who feel that the terms were unclear, the tone of communication intimidating and the price of even the shortest accidental overstay extortionate.  

“The number of vehicle keeper requests that private parking companies make on behalf of their landowner clients is a barometer for how well the private parking system is working, and we believe that the barometer is reading ‘stormy weather’ for ministers who have had the responses to the 2015 public consultation on their desks for two years now. It is high time that politicians - thinking of their election prospects - and landowners alike woke up to the calls for a better, fairer, properly regulated approach.”