TMC MPG data reveals £3,000 difference in driver fuel costs in identical cars
New ‘real-world driving’ data reveals that some fleet
drivers are getting 40 fewer miles per gallon (MPG) than colleagues who drive
Super-frugal fleet diesels are extremely sensitive to their
users’ driving style, according to fuel card and mileage expense
management specialist company TMC, which carried out the analysis.
TMC believes that 50% or more of fleet drivers have not
adapted their technique to modern cars and employers are therefore missing out
on millions of pounds in fuel savings.
Paul Hollick, TMC managing director, said: “It is no longer
just a case of watching out for a handful of rogue drivers on your fleet. It is
likely that half of your company car drivers are getting significantly worse
fuel economy than their car is capable of. Companies and drivers are
collectively wasting millions of pounds every day.”
TMC overlaid thousands of audited mileage reports from 2,300
company car drivers on to fuel transaction data for each a selection of popular
fleet cars - BMW 116d and 320d, Ford Focus and Mondeo, and Volkswagen Golf and
Passat - to measure differences in real-world fuel consumption.
BMW’s 320d series was the best overall performer under
real-world conditions, achieving 52.3 MPG on average. Nevertheless,
like-for-like comparisons showed some startling spreads between users,
according to TMC.
Drivers of the base level BMW 320d Efficient Dynamics model
(officially rated at 68.9 MPG) achieved between 36 MPG and 76 MPG in real-world
conditions, with an average of 55 MPG. The least efficient driver of that model
in the sample cost their company £790 more in fuel every 10,000 business miles
than the most efficient.
TMC, which audits mileage claims from 100,000 drivers to
ensure accuracy and prevent exaggerated claims, found a similar trend across
all model ranges in the analysis.
Models featuring ‘eco’ technologies such as auto stop-start
were particularly sensitive to the way they were driven. MPGs achieved by
drivers in Ford Econetic-badged models varied by 54 MPG between the most and
least efficient user. The spread for Volkswagen BlueMotion cars was 47 MPG and
for BMW EfficientDynamics models it was 48 MPG.
“These variations are mostly down to drivers, not the
technologies,” said Mr Hollick. “In each of the model ranges we looked at,
there were drivers who routinely achieve high MPGs. 7% of users actually
exceeded their car’s official figure. But 45% of drivers in the sample fell
significantly short of their car’s potential fuel economy, not just by 10 or 15
MPG but by 20, 30 or 40 MPG.
“Over three years, the least efficient drivers use around
£3,000 more fuel than the average driver, and up to £5,000 more than the most
efficient drivers of the same model.”
Mr Hollick said it was time for fleets to face up to the
amount of money being poured away because drivers do not adapt their technique
to today’s cars.
“Manufacturers are squeezing better and better economy out
of conventional engines and fleets and drivers are happily taking the tax
breaks on the CO2 emissions. But many companies are passing up a very real
opportunity to slash fuel costs by ensuring their divers know how to get the
best mileage out of their cars,” Mr Hollick concluded.